| |
not to say athletes should stray far
from their in-season training. "Dance with who brung you to the ball", is
a good adage to follow in general, but having more time for recovery
during the non-competitive phase of the year allows for some less
traditional methods of training that might not be applicable during
an intense competitive phase.
Regardless of the training program implemented there are a few
general design factors which must be present in order for it to be
successful; safety, overload and progression, low volume/low
frequency, simple design, the use of basic compound movements, and a
high level of intensity. Safety speaks for itself. A protocol must
be safe for the players, and all movements performed during the
program must be done in strict style with proper form being the
number one factor dictating progression. For example, an athlete who
can perform a set of 30 rep dumbbell deadlifts with the 140's in
immaculate style, but who falters slightly with the 150's, must stay
with the lower weight until perfect form can theoretically be
achieved with the next progressive jump in weight. Although a 10 lb.
jump in weight is almost negligible, with the possible risk of
injury, it is not in the athlete's best interest to make that jump.
If an injury does occur, then he may be reduced to using the 40's
for 30 reps. This is not progression, it is regression, and the
natural desire to lift heavier weights must be counterbalanced by
the needs of their sport and of their physical abilities.
Overload and progression go hand in hand, and as previously stated,
the general needs of the sport and abilities of the players must be
taken into account. In the case of sport specific training or
general strength training, overload and progression must be the
result of reaching a high level of execution of the desired sport
specific skills or sport specific strength, not for the simple fact
of performing more complex conditioning drills before perfecting the
less complex ones or lifting more weight. This is highly
counter-productive and in the long run could lead to diminished
returns on the part of the athlete. As has been stated many times,
benching a 400 lb. max. doesn't necessarily equate to improved play
on the field. A low
volume/low frequency approach to training allows for maximum effort
to be put into each training session, it allows for plenty of
recovery time between bouts of exercise, and in a more practical
vein, especially for collegiate athletes, it takes less time away
from their otherwise hectic academic and extracurricular schedules.
The life of a student athlete is tough, there is no sense putting
more restrictions on their time through long bouts in the weight
room when the same goals can be achieved through shorter and more
intensive training sessions. In general, I believe an extremely high
level of strength and conditioning can be achieved in 4-5 hours per
week. Simplicity of
design is a blessing as well as a curse for athletes. Simple
programs with simple exercises are easy to follow and for those
rookie athletes who don't have a lot of experience in collegiate
weight rooms this is a bonus. The downside is that these types of
programs are brutally hard and if athletes don't "bring it" each and
every time then their results will suffer. A two day split with
heavy high rep squats, Trap Bar deadlifts and weighted sled pulls
performed on one day and heavy medium rep weighted dips, weighted
chins and sandbag carries on the second looks easy on paper, but the
story changes once the gauntlet has begun. Short rest periods and
complete focus in the gym would allow a well conditioned athlete to
perform the above routines in approximately 20 minutes. Simple. Yes!
Easy. Hell no!
The "High Intensity" style of program design also allows for a lot
of creativity and variation on the part of the coaching staff.
Athletes love new challenges and will usually rise to the occasion,
and when one day you ask them to push your Ford F-150 around the
parking lot, they'll brim with enthusiasm. This creates a more
exciting environment for everyone and especially those who simply do
not enjoy the weight room. It also breaks up the monotony of
"lifting weights" and perhaps allows individual athletes, who don't
normally shine in the weight room, to prove themselves in another
protocol. The list of productive compound movements is not an infinite one,
therefore, exercise selection is made much easier. The lists
directly below contain the exercises which I feel best lend
themselves to this specific program. Unfortunately, universities
here in Canada do not have the massive budgets allocated for
athletics which many U.S. schools are fortunate to have. Therefore,
equipment is often basic at best (the following list is tribute to
that). I have never been lucky enough to lay my hands on a Hammer
Strength, Med X, Southern Exercise or like machine in my decade of
training at Canadian university facilities, nonetheless, an
impressive amount of productive exercises can be performed with only
a barbell, dumbbells and a squat rack.
Lower Body Exercises
- Back Squat
- Front Squat
- Hip Belt Squat
- Hacklift
- Barbell Deadlift
- Dumbbell Deadlift
- Barbell Stiff Legged Deadlift
- Dumbbell Stiff Legged Deadlift
- Trap Bar Deadlifts
- Back Lunges (Bar held in Back Squat position)
- Front Lunges (Bar held in Front Squat position)
Upper Body Exercises
- Weighted Dips
- Bench Press
- Dumbbell Bench Press
- Incline Bench Press
- Incline Dumbbell Bench Press
- Weighted Chins
- Barbell Rows
- Dumbbell Rows
- Barbell Pullovers
- Dumbbell Pullovers
"High intensity" is an easy factor to talk about in theory, but to
have an athlete work at maximum intensity is a completely different
thing altogether. Coaches who train their athletes in a high
intensity manner know the type of work output they expect from their
athletes. Unfortunately, many rookies entering this type of system
receive a big shock when they find out how hard they must work to be
even close to par with the veteran athletes, let alone make
themselves stand out.
Intensity comes from two places; a strong work ethic and internal or
intrinsic motivation. Any athlete who has not developed the former
of these skills must do so in order to purely survive, let alone
excel. As for the latter, if an athlete is solely focused on the
prize and not the journey, it is guaranteed that although the work
ethic is there it is not coming from the proper place. An athlete
must first want to improve himself or herself, become a better
person and develop those inner qualities that produce respect for
others, humility and a love for their chosen sport and its history
and traditions. Only then can they begin to focus on the prize.
Without all these factors present an athlete will never fully grasp
or appreciate the sacrifices of others, which have allowed him or
her to reach those heights.
The Program For this particular program, although any major lower body or upper
body movement could be used, I prefer a lower body movement because
of the total size and strength potential of the muscles targeted, as
well as the prime importance of the hips and legs in most any sport.
When one first looks at the program they may very well say that the
volume is too high. I would agree normally, however, this is not a
program to be performed every month. It is, as suggested, a "gut
check" routine, to be performed only once in a while during the
off-season to break the monotony and provide a way to test their
physical and mental readiness for the up-coming competitive season.
This routine may very well leave the athlete slightly to moderately
over trained at the end of it. That is fine. There is sometimes an
advantage to being slightly over trained for short periods of time.
Firstly, it gives the body a chance to get used to working hard
while not being at 100% efficiency and it forces the athlete to work
at full capacity even though their mental state may not be at full
readiness, hence the "gut check". Here is the general skeleton of a
one-month program.
- Week 1 - Workout 1 1x30 @ 80% of 1RM, Workout 2 1x40 @ 80% of 1RM
- Week 2 - Workout 3 1x50 @ 80% of 1RM, Workout 4 1x60 @ 80% of 1RM
- Week 3 - Workout 5 1x70 @ 80% of 1RM, Workout 6 1x80 @ 80% of 1RM
- Week 4 - Workout 7 1x90 @ 80% of 1RM, Workout 8 1x100 @ 80% of 1RM
- Week 5 - Off completely. Absolute passive rest is required. Lift
nothing heavier
than a fork.
Example
Here is a more complete example of the above schedule using the Trap
Bar Deadlift as the major multi joint exercise being performed. As
noted in the chart above, the poundage for your major exercise
remains the same throughout the entire month long period, only the
repetitions change. Calculate approximately 80% of your 1RM and stay
with that poundage the entire time. In the Trap Bar Deadlift, if
your estimated 1RM was 350 lbs., then 80% of that would equal
(350x.80) 280 lbs: 280 lbs. then becomes your working poundage.
Week 1
- Workout 1- TBDL 1x30, Weighted Parallel Wall Sits 5x60 secs, Neck +
Grip Work
- Workout 2- TBDL 1x40, Sled Pulls 3xSet Distance, Neck + Grip Work
Week 2
- Workout 3- TBDL 1X50, Tire Flips 3xSet Distance, Neck + Grip Work
- Workout 4- TBDL 1X60, Sandbag
Bear hug and Walk 3xSet Distance,
Neck
+ Grip Work
Week 3
- Workout 5- TBDL 1X70, Lift and Load Drill 1xMax. Reps, Neck + Grip
Work
- Workout 6- TBDL 1X80, Farmers Walk 3xSet Distance, Neck + Grip Work
Week 4
- Workout 7- TBDL 1X90, Shoulder Barrel 1x20 Each Side, Neck + Grip
Work
- Workout 8- TBDL 1X100, Front Squat with Sandbag 1x20, Neck + Grip
Work
Week 5
Implementation
In this case, although the TBDL is technically a lower body
movement, it actually hits the body's entire musculature;
Trapezius,
latissimus dorsi, deltoids, biceps, triceps, flexors of the hand and
forearm, abdominals, obliques, spinal erectors, gluteus maximus,
quadriceps, hamstrings as well as the gastrocnemius and soleus. This
one aspect of the program is a great bonus, although the volume is
high, only one dominant movement is required for a total body
workout. An additional bonus to this type of program design is that
not only is the musculature taxed severely, leading to hypertrophy
and strength gains, but so is the cardiovascular system, therefore
increasing the strength of the heart and lungs.
Here are some additional ideas to consider. As can easily be
concluded, the set must be done in rest/pause fashion. Other than
that it does not matter how an athlete reaches the final rep, as
long as he or she reaches it. Although there is no set time limit
for each workout, I would set a 45 min. to 1 hour limit in order to
ensure adequate intensity. There are to be no lifting belts used as
they take away from the body's core strength and because of this no
direct abdominal work is necessary. All exercises are to be
performed in a standing position as well, again, more work for the
body's core muscle groups. Grip and neck work are supplementary but
I would suggest doing at least one exercise for each and varying the
exercises done every workout. The athlete's grip will be very tired
at the conclusion of the longer sets and additional work for the
hands and forearms might not be advisable, this would be a personal
decision left to the discretion of the athlete. Every week a smaller
challenge is presented in the form of an "odd object" lift. These
types of exercises provide a chance for athletes to test themselves
in a different manner than they are perhaps accustomed to. They add
a nice variety to the mix. For the duration of the program the
athletes must get as much rest as is necessary/possible between
workouts. The program is demanding enough without making it more so.
So there you have it, a
one-month program that will push your athletes to the limits of
their ability. It isn't pretty, nor is it easy, but what your
players gain in physical and mental strength will translate to a
stronger work ethic and physical readiness on the field. |